The following is a summary of the Year 2008 & 2009 feedback received from participants...
NOTE:  Complete hardcopy results are kept on file at ISG
Comments From Session Participants:  (received through feedback forms) Session Evaluation Scores For Year 2008 & 2009
Session Materials Session Delivery Session Facilities
·         “Liked the workshops”
·         “Instructor was very enthusiastic” Jan 3.6 3.8 3.4
·         “The more I heard about it the more I understood it” 3.8 4 3.6
·         “Liked the group discussion” Feb 3.9 4 3.7
·         “Liked the interaction” 3.7 3.9 3.5
·         “Liked that the ISO Standard is focused on Customer Satisfaction” Mar 3.8 4 3.6
·         “Instructor was very knowledgeable, kept the class awake” 3.9 4 3.9
·         “Liked that the workshops took an auditor perspective on understanding the intent” Apr 3.7 3.9 3.7
·         “Liked the frequent breaks” 3.8 3.9 3.9
·         “Slides were informative” May 3.7 3.9 3.6
3.7 3.9 3.5
·         “Liked doing the audit prep and observing the audit process” Jun 3.9 4 3.6
·         “The session went by quickly – mark of a good Instructor” 3.8 3.7 3.6
·         “Fast paced and interactive” Jul 3.8 4 3.5
·         “The Instructor was knowledgeable and had good examples” 3.9 4 3.8
·         “Liked that the session material covered all of the steps for auditing” Aug 3.8 4 3.6
·         “Instructor was very knowledgeable of course content” 3.6 3.8 3.4
·         “Liked the ‘hands-on’ audit techniques used by the Instructor” Sep 3.8 4 3.6
·         “Liked the mock audits” 3.6 3.7 3.7
·         “Need more time to conduct the mock audits” Oct 3.6 3.8 3.4
·         “Liked the mock audit and the hands-on experience we received” 3.8 4 3.6
·         “Lots of information to digest” Nov 3.8 4 3.6
·         “The Facilitator kept things interesting and enjoyable!” 3.6 3.8 3.4
·         “Few words, yet concise” Dec 3.6 3.8 3.4
·         “Facilitator had good advice made learning fun” 3.8 4 3.6
·         “So much information - so little time” Avg. Score 3.8 3.9 3.6 NOTE: Minimum score = 1; Maximum score = 4
·         “Liked the group discussions of questions”
·         “A little fast but it was necessary”
·         “Liked the group discussions”
·          “Liked the hands-on audits and could have used more of it!”
·          “Facilitator was responsive to our questions – but a little fast at times”
·         “Facilitator presented well with a good sense of humor”
·         “Liked the actual audits”
·         “Presenter was very knowledgeable”
·         “Gained some insight into better auditing techniques”
·         “Instructor was comfortable presenting, knowledgeable and was interested in the topic”
·         “Liked doing an actual audit”
·         “Liked the Instructor’s examples”
·         “Difficult to fit 2 full days into my schedule – time constraints”
·         “Good open interactive session”
·         “Liked the fast pace”
·         “Lots of slides”
·         “Liked the concept of ‘process auditing’ and the 3D approach”
·         “Workshop format worked well”
·         “Liked the process approach to auditing and how to develop a checklist”
·         “Good audit practice – liked the final presentations”
·         “ISO’s not a huge priority of mine but the Instructor made it interesting”
·         “Instructor was concise and understandable with frequent small breaks”
·         “Great refresher as first time I had just started on Quality Team”
·         “Good pace… Instructor always seemed to sense when it was time for a break”
·         “Good focus on completing in a timely manner… Good review of ISO”
·         “Liked that the breaks were timely”
·         “3D Approach is very useful”
·         “Very good Facilitator”
·         “The course materials were well put together”
·         “Facilitator was very knowledgeable”
·         “Sometimes pace was a bit quick”
·         “Liked that the case studies were actual company examples”
·         “Liked that there were frequent breaks”
·         “Very informative”
·         “I liked the opportunity to work on a real case”
·         “Instructor kept a good pace – comfortable but engaged”
·         “I really liked the 3D approach to auditing”
·         “The Instructor shared a lot of great examples from his experiences”
·         “I learned how to audit people so that they were comfortable”
·         “The Instructor had good information and he was easy to follow”
·         “Liked the mock audit”
·         “Relaxed atmosphere, allowed to laugh, not too serious”
·         “Liked that the material covered all aspects of auditing”
·         “The Instructor was easy to understand – it was A-OK”
·         “Liked the mock audit – real life practice”
·         “Facilitator really tried to keep us interested and the frequent breaks helped”
·         “Too many slides at one time – need to break it up more”
·         “Everything was ok - Facilitator didn’t put me to sleep”
·         “Material was very applicable to our process”
·         “Enjoyed the humor and group interactions”
·         “Liked the tips for conducting audits”
·         “Facilitator had a number of good examples”
·         “Liked that the course covered CAR’s and OFI’s”
·         “Facilitator made learning fun – it was very interesting”
·         “Liked the information about the 3D approach to interviewing”
·         “Facilitator had lots of energy”
·         “I feel like I pick up a little more each year”
·         “Facilitator was responsive to our questions – but a little fast at times”
ISO Support Group       519-821-2684       Email Tim... 
5 Darby Road, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1K IR4
© 1998-2008 ISO Support Group Inc.